Service Design in Government 2015: day 2 take-aways

Design in Policy Making

Keynote by Andrea Siodmok who spoke about her experience working with Policy Lab UK.

What can designers bring to policy-making:

  • Provoke: ask unthinkable questions
  • Articulate: identify needs and re-frame the ‘opportunity’
  • Facilitate: create ways for different people to come together and work creatively towards common goals
  • Motivate: understanding what motivates individuals to take part and reduce the ‘effort gap’ / make taking part fun
  • Communicate: visualise and share good ideas
  • Innovate: co-develop radical new systems and innovations to meet challenges

Policy making is not that dissimilar to other professions. Policy makers have some of the same qualities:

  • Knowledgeable
  • Professional
  • Incremental
  • Institutional
  • Centralised
  • Risk averse

They require some of these qualities to become open policy makers:

  • Curious
  • Humble
  • Agile
  • Networked
  • Grounded
  • Experimental

Inputs to open policy:

There’s an Open policy making toolkit available on https://www.gov.uk/open-policy-making-toolkit

Some of the projects the Policy Lab is currently working on:

Some of the tools used by Policy Lab:

The stages of the design process:

Shifting paradigm:

Designers cannot come in wit “answers”. They must listen, understand, and work with teams to find and test solutions.

“Our job is to encourage & create the energy in others so they become the change makers.”

policy lab

“We create next practice, not best practice. Needs time to measure the impact of policy changes and adjust if needed.”

Challenging the Orthodoxy: How Culture Change enables Citizen-centric Services

Talk by Tom Sedge.

Why are services frustrating to use and to deliver? Rethink the old: innovation is new ways of thinking about old problems.

Adopting a proactive approach to prevent problems instead of designing new ways to respond to problems, can bring much better results. For example, thousands of elderly people get injured by falls costing £billions in healthcare. The preventive solution is simple though: safes slippers (reducing admissions by 60% in the UK).

We need to satisfy needs over classifying problems.

Challenging the orthodoxy in Public Services:

Using service design tools in policy making and building public service coalitions

Talk by Jo Carter and Esko Reinikainen from The Satori Lab.

See the presentation slides.

“Build me a …” Transforming Home Office Digital Delivery

Talk by Katy Arnold from The Home Office.

Visa process redesign implied an impressive user research on field in China with 99 users in 8 days.

Guerrilla tactics in usability testing: When time and money are against you

Workshop by Lily Dart and Rose Rees Jones.

Guerrilla usability testing is good for quick and cheap evidence.

We were split into groups of 4/5 people with one person (product owner) choosing a website they’re working on and a user story for that website, to be tested.
Once that was done, the product owner would go to another group to test their task, whilst the rest of the team was left to test that task with another group’s product owner.

I was the product owner in my group and chose to test the following for www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk:

usability form

“As an adult child, full time worker, with elderly parents living on their own, I’m worried about provision of meals to my parents, on a daily basis.”

These were some of the notes taken by the researchers:

post it notes

Alas, the task wasn’t successful. But some very useful insights were taken from the session:

How new digital services can effect real change in public health

Talk by Martyn Evans and Glyn Parry.

The user journey for a sexual health service user in Lambeth & Southwark:

Currently users get tested for STIs but if the results are positive they’re not referred to a doctor. Aim is to iterate the design process until it provides the full journey: testing + treatment.

It’s tricky not no pry on users’ intimate life but at the same time gather enough information to provide safeguarding.

Continuous evaluation process developed by King’s College London and used by SH:24:

Tweets

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s